Cases 21 - 30 of 25,785
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed-Jones v. O'Donnell
as 3:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
Aaron Reed-Jones
Respondent:
Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Respondent:
Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franks v. Jones
as 6:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Franks
Defendant:
Mark A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mabry v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jabar Mabry
Defendant:
CO Hopkins and Lt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02360
Petitioner:
Yakenski Stevens
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Mandela Jones
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Jon Loftos and Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gadsen County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv22047
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones
Defendant:
Gadsen County Sheriffs Department and State of Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
