Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Lowman v. Saluda County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Abin Lee Lowman
Defendant:
Saluda County Jail, J. Ergle, Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dragasits v. Rucker et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dragasits
Defendant:
T. Rucker, Figueros, L. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Langley et al
as 9:2016cv00191
Defendant:
Langley, Shaun B Munson, Ashley L Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson and Eddie Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Williams Sr et al
as 2:2018cv00074
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams Sr
Petitioner:
Rodney L Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley #631420 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Randy Beasley #631420
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, K. Blau, D. Lesatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. Facio et al
as 3:2017cv00286
Defendant:
Erika Facio, Luis Silva and Unknown Defendants
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Edward L Marshall
Plaintiff:
Fidel Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
as 6:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jammie L. Marshall
Defendant:
G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
as 3:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jammie L. Marshall
Defendant:
G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loften v. Paton et al
as 5:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
James E Loften
Defendant:
Ken Paton, Edward L Marshall, Casey Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loften v. Paton et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
James E Loften
Defendant:
Ken Paton, Edward L Marshall, Casey Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
