Cases 21 - 30 of 31
David Byrd v. Secretary, Florida DOC, et al
as 11-15176
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID L. BYRD
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Curtis Byrd, Jr. v. USA
as 10-6478
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS L. BYRD, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Byrd v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00624
Petitioner:
Oscasio L Byrd
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Byrd v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00078
Petitioner:
David L. Byrd
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Byrd v. Booker et al
as 3:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
Oscasio L Byrd
Defendant:
Cheryl Booker, Jolinda Davis and Donna Conn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01419
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Byrd
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 7:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02604
Petitioner:
Curtis L. Byrd, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JANIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
GUST MARION JANIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Byrd v. Dooley et al
as 4:2007cv04018
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Byrd
Defendant:
Nursing Staff, Missy Johnson, Sue Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
