Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Byrd v. Thompson et al
as 3:2020cv00897
Defendant:
M. Ross and Warden Thompson
Plaintiff:
Thomas Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romo Jr. v. TDCJ et al
as 3:2020cv00239
Plaintiff:
Raul Romo Jr.
Defendant:
M. Ross, Warren Clark, John C. Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romo v. TDCJ Wayne Scott Unit et al
as 3:2020cv00160
Respondent:
M. Ross, Officer Lindberg, Officer Partida and others
Petitioner:
Raul Romo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larson v. Trooper J M Ross et al
as 2:2018cv02732
Plaintiff:
Kelly B Larson
Defendant:
Director Leroy Smith, Commander Colonel C N Williamson, Trooper J M Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baskin v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv05590
Defendant:
C M Ross, Zachar, Raeanda L Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Malachi Antwan Baskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv02087
Plaintiff:
Kristopher W. Presley
Defendant:
Jones, C. Cleaves, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. NYS DOCCS
as 17-218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Kearney
Defendant - Appellee:
D. Gebo, Correctional Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, M. Ross, Correction Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and Rae, Sgt.; Coxsackie Correctional Facility, FKA Roe
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Jon Miller, M.D.; Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Jane Doe, Nurse; Coxsackie Correctional Facility
ROSS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07928
Plaintiff:
KEITH M. ROSS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Richard Kearney
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, D. Gebo, M. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Beard et al
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
Lance L. Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Connie Gipson, Elvin Valenzuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
