Cases 21 - 30 of 352
Burrell v. Mayer
as 3:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
Randy Mayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nagy v. Mayer et al
as 3:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
Michael Nagy
Defendant:
Mayer and Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAGY v. MAYER et al
as 1:2022cv02318
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NAGY
Defendant:
MAYER and SNOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayer v. Schepp et al
as 2:2022cv01296
Plaintiff:
Lonny Allen Mayer
Defendant:
Chad Schepp, Minerva Santiago, Rose Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayer v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv01192
Plaintiff:
Lonny Allen Mayer
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Dylan Radtke, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolle v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-8048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD LEE ROLLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON CORP, ROBERT LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director in his official capacity and others
Nico Redding v. The MN Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 22-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nico Redding
Defendant / Appellee:
The Minnesota Department of Corrections, The Centurion Medical Co. Corporation of Minnesota, Et., Al., Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Dept of Corrections and others
Defendant:
Collin Gau, Health Services Director/Supervisor
Mayer v. Radtke
as 2:2022cv00644
Petitioner:
Lonny A Mayer
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrell v. Mayer et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Joe N. Harrell
Defendant:
Matthew Mayer, Terri Ozog, Jake Kothe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Mayer v. USA
as 22-10899
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN MAYER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
