Cases 21 - 30 of 38
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GAUL
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. GAUL, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
Taylor v. Barns et al
as 6:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alonzo Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Mr. Barns, Darrius Simmon and Mr. Barns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locklear v. Hicks et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Locklear, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Barnes, Mr. English, Ms. Layne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duggins v. Barnes
as 2:2020cv03166
Petitioner:
Corey Nocolas Duggins
Respondent:
Mrs Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rankin Bey v. Warren Correctional Institution
as 5:2020ct03215
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Warren Correctional Institution, Mrs. Vaughan, Mrs. Barne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017ct03266
Plaintiff:
Farley L. Bernard
Defendant:
Eddie Thomas, Mr. Monroe, Jimmy D. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2017cv02131
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Walker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Faciltiy F.C.I. Elkton, Steven Merlak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
