Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Brooks v. Harris
as 4:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Brooks
Defendant:
Mr. Harris, Baldwin County Sheriff's Department, Baldwin County Sheriff's Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lilley v. Smith et al
as 5:2016ct03216
Plaintiff:
Chester Lilley
Defendant:
Paula Smith, Mrs. Harris and Dr. Mateakio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLASKO v. GEO CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00938
Plaintiff:
TROY CHARLES BLASKO
Defendant:
ROBERT BURKE, KEITH BUTTS, GEO CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, MR. A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, WILLIAM BUCK ROGERS, Deputy Director and others
Arango v. Slocum et al
as 3:2014cv00570
Plaintiff:
Maximo Ramos Arango
Defendant:
Mr. Slocum, Mr. Harris, Mr. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Nicholas et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashad Moore
Defendant:
Kathy N. Nicholas, Mrs. A Dyer-Azuela, F.N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Cartledge et al
as 9:2013cv01912
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M Arnold
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Mrs Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Cook et al
as 2:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Warden Cook, Deputy Warden Richards, Mrs Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv04768
Plaintiff:
Cedric N. Pierce
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Mrs Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Cook et al
as 5:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Warden Cook, Deputy Warden Richards, Mrs. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
