Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Anderson v. Smith et al
as 8:2016cv03603
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Davron Anderson
Defendant:
Patrick Smith, Warden of Maryland Correction Training Center (M.C.T.C) and Dovey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2016cv07845
Petitioner:
Kevin Patrick Smith
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Orongoes
as 16-3252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Patrick Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Detective Orongoes, Badge # 4078, of and for 73rd Precient, Detective Michael Scoloveno, Badge #5901, Lieutenant Joseph Barone and others
Defendant:
Edwin Diaz, employed at: Copperwood Realestate, Laura Lemle, Eric McPhee, Orsid Realty Corporation and others
Smith v. Greene County Detention Center et al
as 2:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
Claude Patrick Smith
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center, Greene Co. Sheriff Dept., Pat Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fischer
as 13-3022
Petitioner - Appellee:
Patrick Smith
Respondent - Appellant:
Brian Fischer, Superintendent
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Smith v. Hurley
as 4:2012cv02096
Petitioner:
Patrick Smith
Respondent:
James Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Smith v. Hugh Wolfenbarger
as 12-2335
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
HUGH WOLFENBARGER, Warden
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Michael Crosby v. Chad Menzena, et al
as 11-31055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD MENZENA, MARY CROSBY, BING CROSBY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
