Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Ram v. USA
as 5:2016cv05114
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Santosh Ram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ulysses Perez v. William Stephens, Director, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-40347
Plaintiff - Appellant: ULYSSES A. PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARREN S. MAYER, Sergeant TDCJ-CID, TEMPLE RAMMING, State Counsel for Offenders, State of Texas and others
Suarez v. Beard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05756
Plaintiff: Maher Conrad Suarez
Defendant: Jeffrey Beard, Michael Stainer, Kelly Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anul Malik Ram v. Sacramento County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02074
Petitioner: Anul Malik Ram
Respondent: Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Stephens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00409
Plaintiff: Ulysses A Perez
Defendant: William Stephens, Darren S Mayer, Temple Ramming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anul Malik Ram v. Sacramento County
as 2:2015cv06487
Petitioner: Anul Malik Ram
Respondent: Sacramento County
US v. Moorthy Ram We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-6859
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MOORTHY SRINIVASAN RAM
Ram v. USA
as 3:2015cv00284
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Moorthy Srinivasan Ram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ram v. Northeast Regional Center
as 4:2015cv10355
Plaintiff: Moorthy S. Ram
Defendant: Northeast Regional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ram v. Michaud et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv10275
Plaintiff: Moorthy S. Ram
Defendant: D. Michaud, E. Santiago, J. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?