Cases 21 - 30 of 1,625
Schroeder v. Turnbull et al
as 2:2023cv02584
Plaintiff:
Chris Joe Schroeder
Defendant:
Akeem Turnbull and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. Powell et al
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
Chris Schroeder and CJ Schroeder
Defendant:
Jon Powell and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dodge Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
David Alan Carter
Defendant:
Dodge Correctional Institution, Jodi Fields, Nurse Jane Doe 1-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steanhouse v. Schroeder
as 5:2023cv12702
Petitioner:
Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse
Respondent:
Amy Schroeder and Sarah Schroeder
Davis v. Schroeder (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Sterling R. Davis and Sterling Ramonno Davis
Defendant:
Michael Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. USA
as 2:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Joshua Jay Schroeder
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Musafir #414739 v. Schroeder
as 2:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
Yusuf Abdur-Raheem Musafir #414739
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Archer County Sheriff's Office
as 7:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Archer County Sheriff's Office, Jack Curd, Justin Perron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schroeder
Defendant:
Phillis Thomas, Sarah Moore, William Duckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner #112621 v. Schroeder
as 2:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Pierre Turner #112621
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
