Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Shaka v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01431
Petitioner:
Unknown Shaka
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaka Aquil v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-10927
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAKA CINQUE AQUIL
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
H'Shaka v. Bellnier et al
as 9:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Imhotep H'Shaka
Defendant:
Joseph Bellnier, Maureen Bosco, Deborah McCulloch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2016cv01608
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Angel Quirous, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaka v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv03096
Plaintiff:
Unknown Shaka
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Richard Platt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00914
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Scott Semple, Cindy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren Talbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN J. WHELAN, District Attorney, Delaware County, PA and others
Aquil v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00725
Petitioner:
Shaka Cinque Aquil
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALBERT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, JOHN J. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyette v. Shugrue et al
as 1:2016cv10202
Plaintiff:
Shaka U. Dyette
Defendant:
William J. Shugrue, Scott W. Black, Kurt S. DeMoura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
