Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Carter v. United States Army et al
as 4:2017cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bobby R Carter
Defendant:
United States Army and United States Military
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Gray
as 16-3038
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD A. GRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES GRAY, Colonel United States Army Commandant, USDA - Fort Leavenworth
Reyes v. United States Army et al
as 2:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Blake Lee Reyes
Defendant:
United States Army, Windermere Real Estate, Portland City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackerman v. United States Army
as 1:2015cv01273
Petitioner:
Edwin Mark Ackerman
Respondent:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUKIS v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORRECTIONS COMMAND
as 2:2015cv00096
Petitioner:
PETER T. ROUKIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT and UNITED STATES ARMY CORRECTIONS COMMAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ackerman v. Zupan et al
as 1:2014cv03168
Petitioner:
Edwin Mark Ackerman
Respondent:
Zupan and United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ackerman v. United States Army
as 1:2014cv02679
Petitioner:
Edwin Mark Ackerman
Respondent:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Larry James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Army, Monty William Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Briscoe v. United States Department of Ve
as 14-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert V. Briscoe
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs, Northport VA Medical Center, United States Army and others
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES ARMY
as 5:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS L JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY and US ARMY PHYSICAL EVALUATION BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
