Cases 21 - 30 of 1,647
Robert Dorsey, II v. Rebecca Peters, et al
as 23-3216
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. DORSEY, II
Defendant:
LPN REBECCA PETERS, CASE MANAGER A. FOURA-WHITE, NURSE K. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7112
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Terrance Brown v. Scott Krueger, et al
as 23-3052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KRUEGER, Indiana State Police Sgt., ANDREW CHONOWSKI, Special Agent FBI, CAITLIN MARY PADULA, Asst. United States Attorney and others
Lenoir v. United States Attorney General
as 4:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Garland G. Lenoir, III
Respondent:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Lovett et al
as 3:2023cv00214
Petitioner:
Hannibal Moore
Respondent:
S. Lovett, United States Attorney General and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Omar Martinez-Rodriguez v. W. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv08677
Petitioner:
Omar Martinez-Rodriguez and United States Attorney Central District California
Respondent:
W. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
