Cases 31 - 40 of 357
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gibson et al
as 4:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon C Carroll, Bartn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jumper et al
as 4:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, A Cobb and A Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crawford v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01376
Petitioner:
Richard Hoyt Crawford, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WHITTENBURG v. BOWEN et al
as 4:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen and Dodge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCray v. Hoyt
as 22-50200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Ray McCray
Defendant / Appellee:
Kenneth M. Hoyt, U.S. District Judge, U.S. Magistrate Judge, Jefferson County and Lieutenant Glass
WHITTENBURG v. BOWEN et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Respondent:
WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and DODGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
