Cases 31 - 40 of 72,428
Williams-Dorsey v. County of Chenango et al
as 9:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Davonte Williams-Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Chenango, Chenango County Sheriff's Office, Chenango County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01446
Petitioner:
William Morgan Reeves III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Todd K. Baxter, Matt Vanduzee, James E. Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Austin v. William Boher
as 24-6578
Petitioner:
RONALD DURELLE AUSTIN
Respondent:
WILLIAM BOHER, Warden
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 24-10523
Plaintiff:
Edward Brockman
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Sharron Wilson, Assistant Prosecutor William Knight and others
Williams v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Millan Morales v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04830
Petitioner:
William Millan Morales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRISON v. WASHINGTON
as 2:2024cv02531
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MORRISON
Respondent:
M WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
