Cases 31 - 40 of 57,681
Hackborn v. Parsons, et al
as 24-1264
Petitioner:
DEAN D. HACKBORN
Respondent:
WARDEN PARSONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Meyers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AGUILAR v. BOHINSKI, ET AL.
as 3:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
JORGE AGUILAR
Respondent:
JASEN BOHINSKI and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Gray v. US Attorney General
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Joseph Scott Gray
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jose Herrada v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-12012
Petitioner:
JOSE HERRADA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jason Krumback v. Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-2254
Petitioner:
Jason Krumback
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fields #257135 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Washington State Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
