Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Rivera v. Kicks et al
as 1:2012cv07246
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
K. Kicks, D. Clancy, S. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinson et al v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01451
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Brinson and Nicolas Angel-Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. GARRY et al
as 1:2012cv04379
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RIVERA
Defendant:
STOWE GARRY, TIMEK FRANK and PALI MARINELA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS (FBI) et al
as 3:2012cv04174
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RIVERA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS (FBI), OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY (OIP) and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jose Rivera v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-40481
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rivera v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2011cv02072
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Information Policy and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Thaler
as 7:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez
as 3:2011cv01041
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez , Jorge O. Mojica-Vega , Victor Rivera-Percy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Dickhaut
as 1:2010cv10617
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIVERA-LEBRON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2009cv02971
Plaintiff:
JULIO ANGEL RIVERA-LEBRON
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
