Cases 31 - 40 of 28,809
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lewandowski et al
as 4:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
James B. Murphy
Defendant:
Brad Lewandowski, Myron Rau, Gordon Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Defendant:
S. Steadman, P. Wingo, B. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moscoso (PS) v. Diggins
as 1:2024cv01625
Petitioner:
Vinchenzo B. Moscoso and Vinchenzo Moscoso
Respondent:
Elias Diggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00966
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pena v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hemken
as 5:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
DeVonta B. Miller
Defendant:
Chianna Hemken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
