Cases 31 - 40 of 1,432
Griffin v. Algren et al
as 4:2023cv04226
Plaintiff:
Jeramiah J Griffin
Defendant:
Albert Algren, Andy Doyle and Warren County States Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5297
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael J. Horowitz, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Robert Moore v. Warden of W.C.I.
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF W.C.I. SHANE WEBER, NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I., DOCTOR OF W.C.I. JOHN DOE and others
Durden v. Doyle
as 4:2023cv04543
Plaintiff:
Gerald J Durden
Defendant:
Gerald P Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doyle v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Rico Doyle
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Cooper and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CHRISTOPHER GOLDEN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, TATIANA R SALVADOR, STEPHANIE W RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland et al
as 9:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle #300109 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Richard Doyle #300109
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, J. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
