Cases 31 - 40 of 366
Thomas v. Estes et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00629
Plaintiff:
James E. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRISON v. ROCHLIN et al
as 3:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
Fabian T. Morrison
Defendant:
Karen E. Rochlin , Coleman Medium Officials , Tamyra Javis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. USA
as 4:2016cv00655
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael E Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. C.C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2016cv05408
Plaintiff:
Ray E Thomas
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C. and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 16-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practioner and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, #710756-F1
Michael Rinaldi v. USA, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RINALDI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARRELL WATTS, Central Office, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
Thomas v. Lewis
as 1:2015cv02397
Plaintiff:
Reginald E Thomas
Defendant:
D Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula
as 15-7329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Institution, LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS, MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care Provider RN and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAJOR JAMES DEAN, LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS and others
Willie Davis v. J. Thoma
as 15-2927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN J. E. THOMAS
Parks v. Argueta et al
as 1:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Defendant:
S. Argueta, T. Crawford, J. Oldt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
