Cases 31 - 40 of 1,023
Vaughan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
Beau Cameron Vaughan
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, Mr. Byrd, Mr. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coomer v. Roth
as 23-10845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey Harris Coomer
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B. Simmons and others
Raymond Gill v. FCC Coleman Warden, et al
as 23-12717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL and ERIC BRYANT
Defendant / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN WARDEN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, FCC COLEMAN
Silva v. Felton et al
as 7:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Earl Lewis Silva, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Felton, Mrs. Morton, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Alexander
as 23-10843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Defendant / Appellee:
Wade Alexander, Jordan Unit Assistant Warden, Antonious Flanagan, Captain, Carlos Mendoza, Lieutenant and others
Gill et al v. Warden, FCC Coleman et al
as 5:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill and Eric Bryant
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman, United States of America and Prison Correctional Officers, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Eric Ware-Mustapha v. Dixon, et al
as 23-5605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WARE-MUSTAPHA, aka Eric Ware
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DIXON, Kitchen Supervisor 3, OFFICER CLAXTON, Kitchen Supervisor 2, DOCTOR GILL and others
Gill v. Halki et al
as 3:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gill
Defendant:
Doctor Halki, Mike Minev and J Isaacson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv02517
Plaintiff:
Byrlene Lowery
Defendant:
Schanen Davis, Juana Washington and MHO Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Donna Davis, Cynthia Conway, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
