Cases 31 - 40 of 1,337
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintez Talley v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2829
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Gilmore v. Larned State Hospital et al
as 5:2023cv03224
Petitioner:
Christopher Gilmore
Respondent:
Larned State Hospital and Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCNEIL v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
MICKEL J. MCNEIL
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, YARBER, FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST CLAIR BEY v. STORM et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
MAYSON ST CLAIR BEY
Defendant:
STORM, VANIHEL, GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dashawn Grasty v. L. Mabrey
as 23-6901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DASHAWN GRASTY
Defendant / Appellee:
L. MABREY, IVAN GILMORE, Z.S. DUNLEVY and others
Sarr-Daffee v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2023cv03584
Petitioner:
Alhaji Sarr-Daffee
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT ROBERT GILMORE and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2023cv00426
Petitioner:
Charles M Gilmore
Respondent:
M Gutierrez and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
