Cases 31 - 40 of 564
Brazil v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv03921
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Brazil, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief J. Hicks, Correctional Officer Tutherow and Chief Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hope v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Kyle Hope
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Amanda Windell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Teen Challenge America Chad's Hope et al
as 6:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Teen Challenge America Chad's Hope, Steve May and Forrest Quillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toomer v. Tolson et al
as 5:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Shamond Toomer
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John Hicks and Rodney Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Juan Rodriguez v. State of Montana, et al
as 23-35351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DOE, John and Jane; DPHHS Employees and others
Hopings v. Foley
as 3:2023cv00980
Petitioner:
Lawrence Hopings
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogya v. Culotta et al
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Hope Hogya
Defendant:
Judge Vincent Culotta and Brent Urankar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, WHITE, HOPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Npimnee v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
Hope Npimnee
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
