Cases 31 - 40 of 76
French v. Snake River Corr Inst et al
as 2:2015cv02189
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Brown, Sgt. G. Houtz, Supt. Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Frank:
Sgt. Henley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
French v. Snake River Corr Inst, et, al et al
as 2:2015cv00604
Defendant:
S. Allender, M. Kee, Snake River Corr Inst, et, al and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Anson Taylor
Defendant:
Mr. Jeffrey Newcome, Dr. E. Boakye and Mrs. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Boxke et al
as 2:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
James A. Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Boxke, Nurse Taylor and Jeffrey Newcome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Attorney General of Virginia et al
as 3:2014cv00509
Petitioner:
James E. Taylor
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia, Supreme Court of Virginia and its inferior courts and Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement (DCSE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Holloway
as 2:2014cv19234
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Taylor
Defendant:
Gregory Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Trammell
as 14-5029
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES CRAIG TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden
Taylor v. CCA Silverdale et al
as 1:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
James A. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
CCA Silverdale, Jennings, R Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony French v. Borge, et al
as 14-35110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
BORGE, Sergeant, JAMES A. TAYLOR, Lieutenant, R. PARK, Lieutenant and others
Hoard v. Snake River Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2013cv02161
Defendant:
Mr. Brown, Joe Capps, J. Hartman and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Colby Hoard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
