Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv10086
Petitioner:
Lawrence Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections , State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2016cv00220
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Keith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Dann
as 1:2016cv02159
Defendant:
Dann
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2016cv01467
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, MIKE PENCE and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2016cv01466
Defendant:
MONICA GIPSON, NIKKI TAFOYA and P. TALBOT
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00740
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02005
Petitioner:
Keith Johnson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv01173
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00161
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Northern Neck Regional Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Defendant:
Northern Neck Regional Jail, William Reese, Keith Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
