Cases 31 - 40 of 105
BROWN v. LOOMIS et al
as 2:2019cv05996
Defendant:
MS. L. LOOMIS, MR. JOHN DOE, MR. E. BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltie v. Anderson, County of et al
as 8:2019cv03470
Defendant:
Anderson, County of, Anderson County Detention Center, J.T. Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Joseph Stoltie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
MR. ADAM JOSHUA MENDES
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, CGO- MS. D. VARNER, LIETENANT A. LITWHILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ketner v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv06156
Defendant:
Mr. Gregory Link, Mr. Aaron York, Vevia Sturm and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Teresa Ketner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chipman v. Coleman et al
as 5:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Capt Bussey, C.O.II Williams, Dep Warden Security Josh Wicker and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Jamaine Chipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv04982
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, LIETENANT A. LITWHILER, MR. JOHN RAMSON and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ADAM JOSHUA MENDES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv00249
Petitioner:
Mr. John K Stephens and John K. Stephens
Respondent:
Mr. Tim Shoop and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Respondent:
Mr. BARRY SMITH, Mr. JOSH SHAPRIO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Petitioner:
KALEEF JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BONNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02137
Defendant:
DR. GOLSORK MUHAMMAD, MS. VOLTZ, MR. JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THYE BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atum-Rayay v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00108
Defendant:
June Foogle, Mr. John Wilcher, Ms. Donna Simms and others
Plaintiff:
RaHarrakte Sahu Atum-Rayay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
