Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Welch v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02307
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Welch
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, David Smith, Denny Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziman v. USA
as 4:1998cv00070
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mary Rose Ziman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ziman v. USA
as 4:2013cv00095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mary Rose Ziman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
GETTER v. LEMON et al
as 1:2013cv01190
Defendant:
KEVIN BUTTS, ADAM DEMING, DAVID DONHUE and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY GETTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. USA
as 5:2013cv00240
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mary Rose Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ralph Chapa v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 13-15508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH JOHN CHAPA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, named as Joe Arpaio, Sheriff Maricopa County, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, FULTON BROCK and others
Hite v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv02575
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richard Hite
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapa v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv02482
Plaintiff:
Ralph John Chapa
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Zolnierz v. Jack Harris, et al
as 12-16959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS JOHN ZOLNIERZ, also named as: Douglas J. Zolnierz and Douglas Zolnierz
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK F. HARRIS, BARBARA MUNDELL, GARY DONAHUE and others
Ralph Chapa, et al v. Fulton Brock, et al
as 11-17581
Plaintiff:
FRED GRAVES
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH JOHN CHAPA
Defendant - Appellee:
FULTON BROCK, DON STAPLEY, ANDREW KUNASEK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
