Cases 31 - 40 of 458
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arvayo v. Fourth Avenue Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
Andrew Marcus Arvayo
Defendant:
Fourth Avenue Jail, Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Unknown McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Prison Medical Providers
as 1:2023cv01093
Plaintiff:
Montopalus McKay
Defendant:
Prison Medical Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Shoopman
as 3:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Marcus McKay
Defendant:
. Shoopman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Prison Medical Providers
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Montopalus McKay
Defendant:
Prison Medical Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
