Cases 31 - 40 of 389
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5058
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Michael Evan Horowitz, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Michael E. Horowitz, O.I.G, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
BROWN v. ODDO et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
MARVIN LYLE BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN LEMAR ODDO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reid v. Garland
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Terrell Reid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Garland et al
as 9:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Joshua Henderson
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Anne Milgram, Dr. Robert Califf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
