Cases 31 - 40 of 948
Nguyen v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
Helen Nguyen
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Nguyen v. Acevedo
as 2:2023cv01086
Petitioner:
Dai Nguyen
Respondent:
Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilburn v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2023cv04082
Plaintiff:
Andre Wilburn
Defendant:
Virginia Nguyen, Robert Polemeni, Andrew Grubin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phu Nguyen v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 23-2287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHU DUC NGUYEN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
NGUYEN v. KAUFMAN et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY NGUYEN
Defendant:
PA ELLIS KAUFMAN, PA TESTA, PA ROXANNE PLAYSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nguyen v. Stoller et al
as 2:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
Dai Nguyen
Defendant:
John Stoller, Erin Radekin, Gina Le and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Dai Nguyen
Defendant:
K. Williams, D. Zepeda, D. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Greene County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2023cv03131
Plaintiff:
DeShields Dixon
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff's Department and Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintin Anderson v. Dietician Rank et al
as 2:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Quintin Anderson
Defendant:
Dietician Rank and Dietician Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danna Vongamath v. California Information Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Danna Vongamath
Defendant:
California Information Agency, Bounmy Vongamath, Long Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
