Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Tyrian Marshall v. Corporal Moore
as 10-6410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRIAN MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORPORAL MOORE, P. JACKSON, Corporal, CORPORAL COLEMAN and others
Defendant - None:
P. MOORE, JACKSON, COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cassell v. Monroe et al
as 5:2010ct03023
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Cassell, III
Defendant:
Officer Monroe, Doctor, All Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hunt et al
as 1:2010cv00241
Plaintiff:
Julius P Jackson
Defendant:
Rene Hunt , Carolyn Nicholson and Debra Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hunt et al
as 0:2010cv00241
Plaintiff:
Julius P Jackson
Defendant:
Rene Hunt, Carolyn Nicholson and Debra Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Wade Jackson v. Jonathan Roundtree, et al
as 09-31222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE P JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, Medical Director, LADD, Doctor, ABRAMS, Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-31219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Bruce Pearson, Hattie S. Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jackson v. Humphreys
as 2:2009cv01044
Petitioner:
Lavelle P Jackson
Respondent:
Robert Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
