Cases 31 - 40 of 50
James v. SCCF et al
as 2:2013cv02344
Defendant:
County Sheriff Demarco, Division of Parole, Bill Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWKIRK v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 4:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEWKIRK
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, SEAN P MURPHY and MIKE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Murphy et al
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Shawn Evans
Defendant:
P. Murphy, G. Reppert, S. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DODSON v. AKINGBA et al
as 2:2011cv00310
Defendant:
AJIBOLA G. AKINGBA, JAMES BASINGER, SUSAN H. DOTY and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH DODSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rathy v. Rendell, et al
as 10-3120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE FRANKLIN RATHY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ATTY GEN PA, Esquire, Office of the Attorney General, JEFFREY B. MILLER, Commissioner and others
RATHY v. RENDALL et al
as 2:2010cv00802
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FRANKLIN RATHY, SR.
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDALL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR., JEFFREY B. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2010mc00084
Petitioner:
Rock Williams
Respondent:
State of Connecticut and P. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Fischer
as 10-1752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Echo Westley Dixon
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner, James T. Conway, Superintendent, S. Dolce, D.S.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
