Cases 31 - 40 of 27,317
Kristy Richard v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11910
Petitioner:
KRISTY RICHARD
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Defendant:
RICHARD GASKIN and DEZARAY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole
as 24-4069
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHAD RANDALL
Defendant:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE
Michael Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward C, et al
as 24-11913
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. FILLMORE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR BROWARD COUNTY, MICHAEL J. SATZ, CHRISTINA STRANDELL and others
SHEETS v. DADY et al
as 2:2024cv00831
Petitioner:
RICHARD SHEETS
Respondent:
SHANE DADY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dextraze v. Cribb et al
as 4:2024cv03407
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Cribb, Deputy Sheriff Scott, Deputy Sheriff White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Mondules
as 9:2024cv03406
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mondules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Lay v. Hooper
as 24-30350
Petitioner:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
