Cases 31 - 40 of 563
Young, Steve v. Rudolph et al
as 3:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Steve Young
Defendant:
Officer Rudolph, Supervisor Ms. Mellenberger and C. Hickey-Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Lares et al
as 1:2022cv02657
Plaintiff:
Carleous Darrell Clay
Defendant:
L. Lares and Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs, Shareef v. Rudolph et al
as 3:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
Shareef Childs
Defendant:
Officer Rudolph, Ms. Mullenburger and Claire Hickey-Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NYENEKOR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv02702
Plaintiff:
CARPEAH RUDOLPH NYENEKOR, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. KELLY and N. SAMMON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Eagle v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Eagle
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Tolbert v. Officer Singleton, et al
as 22-13089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY TOLBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
SINGLETON, CO1 and RUDOLPH
Jenkins v. Norman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
DeMarkis Ishael Jenkins
Defendant:
Tyler W. Norman, Jordan Levine, Officer Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGRIFF v. CLOSE, et al.
as 2:2022cv03071
Petitioner:
RUDOLPH MCGRIFF
Respondent:
DAVID CLOSE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Knox et al
as 1:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Rudolph A. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Knox, Officer Godfrey and Slepawic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Alzua v. Sheriff of Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Alzua
Defendant:
Sheriff of Washoe County and Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
