Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Hammonds v. Ross et al
as 2:2017cv02363
Plaintiff:
Carlton Leon Hammonds, Jr
Defendant:
C Ross, E Slater, Regional Director Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAUKE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00418
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
KEENAN R. HAUKE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Keller v. Samuels
as 3:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrick Keller
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMOOT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00358
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, KRUGER and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. Kane et al
as 2:2017cv02472
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith
Defendant:
Thomas R Kane, J Velasquez, K Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIAL v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
SHOUNDELLE DONTIA DIAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, BRADLEY T. GROSS, ANGELA P. DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Webb-el v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 17-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas R. Kane, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission, A. Smith, A-2 Unit Counselor, Federal Correctional Institution and others
HINDMAN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00323
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ray v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Carole Ray
Defendant:
United States of America, Thomas R. Kane, Nurse Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv04978
Petitioner:
BRIAN ANTWANIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
