Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 23,304
Duncan v. Potter County et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Plaintiff: James Daniel Duncan
Defendant: Potter County, Randall County and Amarillo Potter County Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff: Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant: Randall County Jail, Christopher Forbis, Randall Co Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01397
Plaintiff: Darrian Daniels
Defendant: Anthony Wills and John/Jane 1 Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate
as 5:2024ct03137
Plaintiff: Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant: Lt. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. USA
as 2:2024cv00090
Petitioner: Kristen Danielle Reynolds
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant: Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff: K. D. H.
Defendant: Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant: SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, TOMMY J SMITH, ALISON BURLESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff: Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant: Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Heredia
as 6:2024cv00855
Plaintiff: Dusty Jo Daniel
Defendant: Deputy Heredia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?