Cases 41 - 50 of 97
William Carawan, Jr. v. Mitchell
as 16-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL, MILLER, MCCOY and others
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoosier v. Liu et al
as 2:2016cv10688
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Hoosier
Defendant:
Wendy Liu, Karen Rhodes, Vicki Carlson and others
Carawan v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
William Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell, FNU Miller, FNU McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Parker v. Thomas Del Ricci, et al
as 15-3267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER, MR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JUDGE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, RISA V. FURMAN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY and others
Boulding v. Sudhir et al
as 2:2015cv12706
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boulding
Defendant:
Bhamini Sudhir, Corizon Health, Inc., Steven Bergman and others
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Weaver et al
as 9:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
Darcy A. Copeland , Jr.
Defendant:
Weaver, Barr, Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Weaver et al
as 1:2015cv02092
Plaintiff:
Darcy A. Copeland , Jr.
Defendant:
Weaver, Barr, Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corscadden v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gary Corscadden
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
