Cases 41 - 50 of 575
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6214
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tatar v. Griffin et al
as 2:2023cv02023
Defendant:
CMC Johnson, STA Zebtaski, Edu Officer (F/N/U) Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Serdar Tatar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Butler v. Nurse Hryn
as 22-7469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE HRYN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAW, JR. and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull and others
Murithi et al v. Godnez et al
as 1:2022cv06023
Plaintiff:
Mwenda Murithi
Defendant:
Salvador A Godnez, Sherry Benton, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard-White v. Best
as 1:2022cv02829
Plaintiff:
Anthony Howard-White
Defendant:
COII Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Andrew Jones, City of Lee's Summit, Lee's Summit Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. USA
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Brandon Best Gordon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Driver v. Best et al
as 2:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Best, Xiong, Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
