Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Alexander v. Stirling et al
as 4:2018cv03568
Defendant:
M.C.C.I. Commissary, Warden Charles Mitchell Williams, Bryan P. Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
James Walter Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hartford States Attorney Office et al
as 3:2018cv01700
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Bail Commissioner Office, Phillip Fuschino and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Luera et al
as 5:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams
Defendant:
Kristina Luera and Mandi Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Bill Gates, Steve Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Kernan
as 2:2018cv01108
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hill, Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr, Clifton Terrell and others
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, R. Meier, D. Baughman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hartford" et al
as 3:2017cv02098
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Williams
Defendant:
"City of Hartford, "Cheryl Gogins and "Nancy Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Texas
as 5:2017cv00223
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Williams
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. The County of Alameda et al
as 3:2017cv04785
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Williams
Respondent:
The County of Alameda, The District Attorney's Office and The Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Marsha McLane, Executive Director-TCCO
as 5:2017cv00123
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Williams v. Office of District Attorney Er, et al
as 17-1831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES S. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, JOHN H. DANERI, (Jack, District Attorney) and BRUCE TACKETT, Forensic Scientist, Pennsylvania State Police
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
