Cases 41 - 50 of 5,922
Todd Dean v. Andrew Ciolli, et al
as 24-1617
Plaintiff:
TODD G. DEAN
Defendant:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden, Complex Warden, NURSE TAYLOR, OFFICER PILATO and others
SMALLWOOD v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SGT. BETHAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easter v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Skyler Dean Easter
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Sutton, H. Son and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mojica v. Jirasek et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Mojica
Defendant:
Blake Jirasek, Brian Connolly, Dee McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant Davis v. Darius Horton
as 24-6299
Plaintiff:
BRYANT E. DAVIS, a/k/a Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
DARIUS HORTON, EXPRESS FUNERAL FUNDING, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Rodgers et al v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales
as 3:2024cv01998
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Rodgers, Michael Dean Rodgers and Albert L. Martinez
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dean Acosta
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
