Cases 41 - 50 of 14,018
Edward v. McIntosh County Board of Commissioners et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County Board of Commissioners, Monica Smith and Mary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Wayne Adkins
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Brian Eller, Unknown Correction Officer One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delavega v. Cox et al
as 3:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Delavega
Defendant:
Ashley Cox, Frank Catino, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
TRAVON FINCHER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REGAL et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
ALTON LEON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, FRANK VANIHEL and ERIC J. HOLCOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Davis v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Jon Walton and Frank Strata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
