Cases 41 - 50 of 1,508
Horton v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Anthony Horton
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, McCarthy, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Ames
as 3:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Adonne Horton
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson et al v. First Transit, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06826
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anderson, James Bellamy, Troy Blount and others
Defendant:
First Transit, Inc., Adam Moore, Junior Dawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Horton
as 7:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Green
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant 7:23-CV-69-O and Sheriff Sidney Kirk Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2023cv00924
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Horton v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08318
Plaintiff:
Triston A Horton
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SANCHEZ et al
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
S SANCHEZ, MAZINGO, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Horton, et al
as 23-2084
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO CHAVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
