Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Mailliard King v. T. Carey, et al
as 10-15720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAILLIARD LUCIEN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
T. L. CAREY, D. K. SISTO, C. D. BROWN and others
Sam v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Clinton Daniel Sam
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office, Dennis Couvillon, Melvin Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Steele
as 4:2009cv01950
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Butler
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewer v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00336
Plaintiff:
Keith D Brewer
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Kathryn Bowman, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Eslinger
as 6:2009cv01837
Petitioner:
Nicholas J. Butler
Respondent:
Donald F. Eslinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv02412
Plaintiff:
William Townsend, Jr.
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, John W. Haviland, V D Brumfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv02342
Plaintiff:
William Townsend, Jr.
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, J.W. Haviland, C.D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00602
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Plaintiff:
Albert J Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Parker v. Thomas Butler, et al
as 09-30357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL D PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J BUTLER, A F ARMOND, JR., SONNY ARMOND, JR. and others
Garcia et al v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Alfred Garcia, Cornelius Alix, Anthony J Boyd and others
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
