Cases 41 - 50 of 206
Davis v. McClure et al
as 5:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Respondent:
FNU McClure, FNU Shotwell and Norma Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McClure et al Case transferred to ND/TX Lubbock Division
as 1:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
FNU McClure, FNU Shotwell and Norma Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Ortiz et al Transferred to ND/TX, Lubbock Division
as 1:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
UP Ortiz, UP Reimer, Sharla Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Commissioner of D.O.C. et al
as 7:2016cv04034
Plaintiff:
James Davis, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of D.O.C., E.R.T. Response Team and DiChiara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Wayne Abernathy, Kent W. Brown, Clerk of Court Rutherford County, District, Superior and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Pate et al
as 8:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Darian Antonio Coleman
Defendant:
John Pate , Charlie Frazier , Leon Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Berry et al
as 1:2016cv00559
Petitioner:
Timothy James Davis
Respondent:
Walter Berry, Samuel S. Olens and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeves #263041 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Reeves
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, M Davis, Mike Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Werner
as 6:2015cv00212
Petitioner:
Rhondy James Davis, Sr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens and John P. Werner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
