Cases 41 - 50 of 17,889
HOOKS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00129
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
KEVIN HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mack v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Mack, Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony Quillmann, Jeremy Bean, James E. Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feliciano v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01427
Petitioner:
Kevin Feliciano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Steed et al
as 6:2024cv06113
Defendant:
Turnkey Health, Trooper Kevin Steed and Sheriff Mike McCormick
Plaintiff:
Jerimiah Bryce Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Louise et al
as 3:2024cv00699
Defendant:
Louise and J Thompson
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Meyers and Kevin Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunay v. Christianson et al
as 2:2024cv01058
Defendant:
Jonathan D Christianson, Brandon Stahmann, Mathew Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Dunay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metzger v. Randall et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Defendant:
Kevin Bryson and William Randall
Plaintiff:
Chad Metzger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBLEE v. SAULSBURY
as 3:2024cv00380
Respondent:
SHERRY SAULSBURY
Petitioner:
JAMES KEVIN CHAMBLEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COIT v. PA DOC, et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
DEPUTY SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and PA DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Defendant:
CO II Lupo, Warden Brian Adams, Ms. Jerald and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
