Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Robert, Dashawn v. Visions Night Club et al
as 3:2019cv00401
Defendant:
City of Madison, David Brown, Tom Reichenberger and others
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Robert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Straughn et al
as 5:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Cook, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Castaloo et al
as 6:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Night Shift Jail Staff and FNU Castaloo
Plaintiff:
Daniel McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv02514
Defendant:
Day Time and Night Time Drom Officers, Richland County Jail Detention Center, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Sims, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv02257
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ofc Beck, Bryan Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Anthony Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATUM v. SANTA ROSA SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2018cv01363
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHARLES WENDEL TATUM
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA SHERIFFS OFFICE, SANTA ROSA COUNTY JAIL, SANTA ROSA PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrance Irby v. State of Washington, et al
as 18-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, BERNARD EDWARD WARNER, DAN PACHOLKE and others
Esterlin Appolon v. Kevin The, et al
as 18-15457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTERLIN APPOLON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN THE, CHRIS MAGUS, MARCO BORBOA and others
Wesley v. Belum et al
as 1:2018cv00591
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clarence Wesley
Defendant:
Belum, Jane Doe and Night Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brevard County Jail Complex et al
as 6:2017cv01286
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail Complex, Law Librarian, Wayne Ivory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
