Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Jones v. Jackson et al
as 5:2015cv02047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Paul Jones
Defendant:
Tamara Jackson, Gary Hobbs, Dennis Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Capps et al
as 3:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Defendant:
Timothy Capps, Jeffrey Farris, Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wilson
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Corizon, LLC, Geeneen A. Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv00771
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Arnold
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, George A. Lombardi, Pat-Roes 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Arnold v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
as 15-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael L. Arnold
Defendant - Appellee:
Corizon Medical Services, Dr. Michael Hakala, Dr. Paul Jones and others
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00490
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jonathan Jones v. Richard Fitzgerald, et al
as 14-3415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD FITZGERALD, County Executive, DR. KARL WILLIAMS and LORENZ, Lab Tech
Files v. Alexander City Alabama, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 3:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant:
Alexander City, Alabama, Barbara Young, Charles Raford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
RICH FITZGERALD, KARL WILLIAMS and LORENZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
