Cases 41 - 50 of 1,195
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Demaurea Davis and De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schutt v. Lincoln County et al
as 3:2023cv01322
Plaintiff:
Jason Schutt
Defendant:
Lincoln County, Lincoln County Jail, Lincoln County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Tramell Deon Young
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gates v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gates
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey and Sandy Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Jaquan Arkeem Hale
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morrison v. Billings Clinic et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Defendant:
Billings Clinic, Indian Health Services, Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morel v. Pearce et al
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Kevin Pearce, James Adams, Nathan Tussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
