Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Singleton v. Shook et al
as 3:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Avery Singleton
Defendant:
Mrs. Shook, J. Brookhart and Ryan Klier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Lagmay v. Shelley Nobriga, et al
as 17-16109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LAGMAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLEY NOBRIGA, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, FRANCIS SEQUEIRA and others
Logan v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
James Alexander Logan
Defendant:
William Hall, Michael Eppeny, Hoss Shook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOOK v. ROGERS
as 1:2017cv00907
Defendant:
STEVE ROGERS
Plaintiff:
JOHN SHOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marion v. Tubbs et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Marion
Defendant:
NFN Tubbs, S Gonzales, NFN Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Rabun County Detention Center
as 2:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hooper
Defendant:
Tony Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marion Sherrod v. Sid Harkleroad
as 16-7045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARION L. SHERROD
Defendant - Appellee:
SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent at North Carolina Department of Corr., EDWARDS, STEPHEN SHOOK, Stg. Officer at North Carolina Department of Corr. and others
Defendant:
JOHN MORGAN, Medical Provider at North Carolina Department of Corr. and LARRY BASS
Lagmay v. Nobriga, et al
as 1:2016cv00408
Plaintiff:
Henry Lagmay
Defendant:
Shelly Nobriga, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequeira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
