Cases 41 - 50 of 1,256
Herr v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq00887
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Manson Herr
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
John Galipeau, K Watts, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HERR v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
PAUL HERR
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Three Fifty Markets Ltd. v. Argos M M/V
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Three Fifty Markets Ltd.
Defendant:
Argos M M/V and Argos Bulkers, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
PMG Holding SRL
Intervenor:
ArcelorMittal International (Luxembourg) S.A. and ArcelorMittal (Costa Rica) S.A.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31342 Breach of Maritime Contract
Webb v. 84 Lumber Company
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jacob Webb
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
W R Berkley Corp v. Julie Ann Dunai
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
W R BERKLEY CORP, a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIE ANN W. DUNAI
Elizabeth Carley v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections
Respondent:
NDOC/FMWCC and JO GENTRY, Warden
(PC)Williams v. Prudhel et al
as 2:2022cv02250
Plaintiff:
Bobby James Williams
Defendant:
Joshua Prudhel, Jeff Leech, Ryan Herr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
